Former CS Raphael Tuju Petitions Chief Justice Over Alleged Ksh 10 Million Bribe Demand

Former Cabinet Secretary Raphael Tuju has submitted a petition to the Chief Justice of Kenya alleging that a judge presiding over his case demanded a bribe of Ksh 10 million. 

The claim emerged after brokers who were arrested at Tuju’s home by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) reportedly revealed the alleged solicitation.

In his petition, Tuju explained that the brokers informed him about the judge’s demand, saying it was relayed during communications involving a Mr. Mulwa. 

According to Tuju, Mulwa contacted the judge while discussions were ongoing at Entim Sidai, suggesting that intermediaries were used to convey the bribe request.

Tuju is now asking the Chief Justice to urgently investigate the matter to safeguard the integrity of the judiciary.

The former CS emphasized that bribery claims against judges are serious and, if true, threaten the credibility of Kenya’s justice system.

He argued that public trust in the courts depends on judges acting impartially and transparently.

By bringing the matter to the Chief Justice, Tuju aims to ensure that any wrongdoing is fully investigated and that responsible individuals face consequences.

Tuju’s petition requests the Chief Justice to initiate a formal inquiry into the conduct of the judge and any persons involved in the alleged bribery attempt.

It calls for protective measures to ensure that his case and other judicial matters are handled without interference, favoritism, or corrupt practices.

The petition highlights the importance of judicial accountability in maintaining public confidence in the legal system.

Observers note that the petition places significant responsibility on the Chief Justice to examine the claims carefully.

If the allegations are substantiated, the matter could lead to disciplinary action against the judge and others implicated.

Experts stress that judicial officers must uphold the highest standards of integrity, as any breach undermines the rule of law and the fairness of legal proceedings.

According to Tuju, the use of intermediaries, including Mr. Mulwa, in attempting to communicate the alleged bribe raises questions about the methods employed and potential complicity.

The petition seeks to clarify these interactions and determine the full extent of any misconduct.

The EACC’s arrest of the brokers at Tuju’s residence adds a layer of complexity to the case, as it indicates that investigations into corruption-related matters are ongoing.

Tuju’s petition, therefore, complements anti-corruption efforts by drawing attention to possible misconduct within the judiciary itself.