Kindiki Puts Opposition on the Spot Over ‘Selective Outrage’ Against Ruto

Deputy President Kithure Kindiki has intensified the political debate by confronting opposition leaders with tough questions over what he termed as “selective outrage” in defending the presidency.

Speaking during a public rally, Kindiki challenged critics of William Ruto, asking why similar concerns were not raised during the administrations of former presidents Mwai Kibaki and Uhuru Kenyatta. 

His remarks centered on the opposition’s condemnation of Ruto’s recent sharp political responses, which some have labeled as unpresidential.

“Why didn’t they tell Kibaki or Uhuru ‘wantam’?” Kindiki posed, suggesting that critics are applying double standards when addressing the conduct of the current head of state. 

The term, often used in political slang to criticize leadership, was employed to underscore what he described as inconsistent reactions from Ruto’s opponents.

The deputy president urged Kenyans to maintain respect for the office of the president, regardless of political differences. 

He argued that persistent personal attacks not only undermine the dignity of the presidency but also shift focus away from meaningful national discussions on development and policy.

In a show of loyalty, Kindiki stated that he is ready to directly confront individuals who insult the president, allowing Ruto to concentrate on governance and service delivery. 

His remarks come amid ongoing exchanges between the government and opposition figures, particularly following the president’s recent outspoken engagements during tours in Western Kenya.

Kindiki further claimed that while past leaders faced criticism, they were not subjected to the same level of sustained personal attacks now directed at Ruto. 

He called on opposition leaders to move beyond rhetoric and instead present clear policy alternatives to Kenyans.

The rally, which attracted large crowds, highlighted continued support for the government’s agenda in the region. 

Kindiki’s statements reinforce the administration’s broader strategy of defending the presidency while pushing back against criticism it considers excessive or politically motivated.